{"id":9892,"date":"2011-02-16T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-16T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/2011\/02\/16\/court-rules-judge-s-ten-commandments-poster-unconstitutional\/"},"modified":"2011-02-16T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-02-16T12:00:00","slug":"court-rules-judge-s-ten-commandments-poster-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/2011\/02\/16\/court-rules-judge-s-ten-commandments-poster-unconstitutional\/","title":{"rendered":"Court Rules Judge&#8217;s Ten Commandments Poster Unconstitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>UNITED STATES, February 2011: An Ohio county court judge who argued that it was his First Amendment right to hang a poster about the Ten Commandments in his courtroom was overruled Wednesday (Feb. 2) by a federal appeals court. Judge James DeWeese of Richland County, Ohio, has sought over the last decade to post the biblical laws. In the latest case, he created a poster that compared the commandments&#8217; &#8216;moral absolutes&#8217; and humanism&#8217;s &#8216;moral relatives.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that DeWeese&#8217;s poster is unconstitutional because it is &#8216;an explicit endorsement of religion.&#8217; Francis Manion, an attorney for the American Center for Law and Justice who represented DeWeese, said it is likely the Ohio judge will appeal.<\/p>\n<p>Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a Washington watchdog group that filed a brief in the case against DeWeese, welcomed the decision. &#8216;Our courts are supposed to provide equal justice for all, not promote religious law,&#8217; said the Rev. Barry Lynn, the executive director of Americans United. &#8216;Judges should never send the message that some religious traditions have a preferred place in the courtroom.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><a href='Religion News Service'>Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>UNITED STATES, February 2011: An Ohio county court judge who argued that it was his First Amendment right to hang,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hinduismtoday.com\/hpi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}