|
|
 |
January 1991
An Open Letter to Evangelicals
Palani, Sivasiva
We send greetings and the
rainbowed aloha from Hawaii to you, Stan Guthrie, to Rev. James Reapsome
and our friends at the Evangelical Missions Quarterly. You have asked us
to reflect on the "growing missionary spirit in Hinduism" with special
reference to the reasons behind it, the extent of its influence and what
the future holds. When I opened your letter, I thought the subject too
vast and the time too short. A proper response would require months of
research, not to mention the days of crystal-ball work you threw in. Then
I realized that every worthy enterprise in history began with someone's
rash and unruly theory and suddenly felt a new sense of competence in
undertaking the task you set.
There are many who will tell you that
Hinduism has no missionary dimension at all. Zip. They have witnessed the
devastating social and personal effects of unethical missionary effort
over several centuries, and this impels them to repudiate the missionary
spirit. If by the word missionary we mean the attitudes and strategies of
aggressive world proselytism, then they are right. Hindus find such an
approach to spirituality uncouth, not spiritual at all, but more akin to
the ways of door-to-door encyclopedia salesmen. To a Hindu, spirituality
is humble, loving, serene, introspective, all-embracing. The corollary is
that anything which is arrogant, disdainful, anxious, externalized and
intolerant is not spiritual. And right or wrong, Hindus view most
missionaries as possessing the latter qualities in healthy
measure.
On the other hand, if by the word missionary we mean an
eagerness to share our beloved faith with those who want to know of it,
then these people are dead wrong and Hinduism is a missionary tradition.
Adi Shankara was a missionary of this type, so were Chaitanya and Appar.
Hindu philosopher and ex-president of India, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
(1888-1975), wrote in The Hindu View of Life: "In a sense, Hinduism may be
regarded as the first example in the world of a missionary religion. Only
its missionary spirit is different from that associated with the
proselytizing creeds. It did not regard as its mission to convert humanity
to any one opinion. For what counts is conduct, not belief."
I
think you are right that Hinduism's missionary sense is growing. Witness
the internationalization of dozens of Hindu institutions locked for
centuries inside India. Consider the successful and controversial ISKCON,
or Hare Krishna movement, with an artistic and well-funded publications
program distributing millions of books in dozens of languages each year.
The rapidly-growing Radhasoami and Sai Baba movements have made vigorous
efforts to move onto the global stage. There is the Brahma Kumari sect,
strong in education and the peace movement, working effectively at the
United Nations. Their millenarian concepts (unusual in the Hindu world),
feminist emphasis, disciplined ways and ecumenical meditations make them a
force to contend with.
The real action is not in the big movements,
it's in a million villages from Georgetown to Montreal, from Durban to
Chicago. Hindus everywhere are becoming stronger and more assertive. You
have asked why. I offer six possible reasons: 1) There has been an
unprecedented influx of talent and money from the West in the past 30
years, giving these groups the ability to reach out. When a Hindu moves
into a US boardroom or an American truth seeker joins a rural ashram in
Kentucky, suddenly members have access to new resources, to computers and
communications facilities. The group's message is the same, but the means
to promote it has been amplified several magnitudes; 2) The West is
clearly open to the Hindu message, ready to hear about yoga, meditation,
mysticism, healing and the ancient ways. Such "products" were too
sophisticated for public consumption 30 years ago, but today they're the
hottest item on the shelf. Not a small part of this phenomenon is related,
indirectly, to the coming of age of the New Age movement: 3) The new rules
of world spirituality are a reason. As once-believing nations bury
communism's failed effort to conquer the world, so a large part of the
non-Christian/non-Muslim world is laying to rest the conquest-driven,
one-way-only concept of religion. They are replacing it with views of the
Divine which they perceive to be more healing, more focused on the
individuals search for enlightenment, more naturally devotional, richer in
technique and less authoritarian. A related trend is the wholesale
rejection of concepts of hell, sin and satan. A 1990 San Francisco
Chronicle poll showed that 35% of the local residents practice yoga or
meditation and 25% believe in reincarnation. Hindu institutions find they
have answers when people ask about chakras, inner light or consciousness.
They have methods when people want to calm the mind and "go within." This
knowledge is the stock-in-trade of any Hindu teacher; 4) The dual support
which science and the Green Movement have inadvertently given to Hindu
custom and thought, which is inherently aligned with human and animal
rights, with strict nonviolence, with an awareness, indeed a reverence, of
nature; 5) The remarkable discovery made by the human family of late, that
ethnic and native cultures possess value and must, like species, be
preserved from further extinction. This can be seen among the Hawaiians,
the Eskimos, the Native Americans, the tribals of Africa, Japan,
Australia-virtually everywhere! Hinduism, with a culture older than them
all, has benefited from, and supported, this ethnic renaissance; 6) A
backlash among certain Hindus who feel they have for too long been abused
by succeeding waves of missionaries: Dutch, Portuguese, Moslem, British
and American. They seem to have reached their limit to forebear,
preferring now to express defiance, to wield power instead of wisdom.
Unfortunately, this decidedly violent and un-Hindu response is
burgeoning.
That is the why of it all. Now to what the future may
hold. I suspect that Hinduism will have a surprisingly sophisticated
network around the globe in another 20 years. You will see the first Hindu
encyclopedia and far more publications from Hindus, and people will
appreciate their lack of unbending dogma as a new wisdom. There will be no
TV evangelism, no mass meetings in football stadiums. That does not fit
the Hindu's way. It will be small, intimate, grass roots. You will see the
unusual missionary style of the TM movement proliferate - a button-down,
quasi-scientific validation of the ancient Vedic tradition. You will see
alliances form among Hindus and Christians (probably Episcopalians at
first, not the Assembly of God). International conclaves, especially the
peace and ecumenical movements, will be deeply affected by Hindus. A small
army of yoga missionaries - hatha, raja, siddha and kundalini -
beautifully trained in the last 10 years, is about to set upon the western
world. They may not call themselves Hindu, but Hindus know where yoga came
from and where it goes.
We hope this proves useful to you. I close
with a quote from Swami Vivekananda, Hinduism's greatest modern
missionary, spoken in January of 1895, "What I now want is a band of fiery
missionaries." It's a hundred years late. but it appears he's going to get
his wish.
Article copyright Himalayan
Academy.
Return to the Table of Contents
Return to Hinduism Today Home Page
|